California Church Bus Crash Highlights Need For Seat Belts On All Buses

California Church Bus Crash Highlights Need For Seat Belts On All Buses

A fatal church bus crash that recently occurred on a peak road near Lake Gregory in California highlights for many parents, safety advocates, and injury lawyers the need for seat belts on all buses. Last February, a bus carrying 21 youthful members of a Pasadena church association collided with an SUV, the impact sending it 25 feet down a snowy rampart and into a 50 - foot cedar, crushing its cab. The driver of the bus was killed and all of the passengers were injured, some critically. None of them had been wearing seat belts. The bus was not efficient with them, according to the California Highway Watch.
While the public domination does not require school buses weighing over 10, 000 pounds to be outfitted with seat belts, California does, however, only on newer models: all school buses manufactured on and after July 1, 2005 capable of carrying more that 16 passengers, as well as all school buses manufactured on and after July 1, 2004, according to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Buses weighing less than 10, 000 pounds fall under national regulations and are required to have seat belts.
Such laws, unfortunately, do not tally for older, immense buses like the one used by the church body. Although the media has only indicated that the bus lacked seat belts, photographs of the accident suggest that it was manufactured long before 2004. Not retrofitting vehicles—or requiring them to be retrofitted—has been one area where vehicle renter legislation has failed. Last summer, a child died after being ejected from her father’s 1956 Volkswagen Beetle during a collision. The Protrude, much like the church bus, was exempt from seat belt laws.
Why haven’t public seat belt regulations been adopted for all school buses, ancient and new? The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration claims that “school buses are one of the safest forms of transportation in the United States, ” citing their design as the kickoff of their safety during crashes. The Administration asserts that because they are bulky they issue crash forces differently than passenger cars, causing bus occupants to experience less of the impact from an accident than other vehicle occupants.
The Administration also claims that the occupier lee provided by a safety approach called “compartmentalization” negates the need for seat belts on school buses. A key factor of compartmentalization is equipping buses with “strong, closely - spaced seats that have dash - gracious seat backs. ”
" School buses may be safer than other vehicles, but accidents involving them still claim a cogent digit of lives. In 2009, NHTSA reported that 118 people were killed and 13, 000 injured in school bus related crashes in 2009 ", according to Jim Ballidis a California injury lawyer. While California is one of the few states to mandate seat belts for school buses, the tragic accident that left 21 fresh people injured in the mountains near Lake Gregory serves as an darner that relating legislation should be extended to older buses. Considering that seat belts reduce the risk of suffering fatal injuries during a crash by approximately 45 %, all vehicles should be instructed with them.