New Seat Belt Safety Research

New Seat Belt Safety Research

In the United States, one motive of whether a vehicle renter will persist in an accident is the use of a seat belt. At approximately 8: 30 p. m. on Saturday, October 2nd, 2010, 63 - lifetime - elderly Catherine Marie Harless was march along Long Boulevard in a Chevy Silverado pickup truck when a drunk driver veered into her alley and struck her head - on. Babe suffered major injuries and was pronounced colorless at the scene. It was reported that gal had not been wearing a seat belt. Harless joined the thousands of other victims of drunk driving that eventide. However if gal had been wearing a safety restraint, her chances of surviving the accident may have been higher.
In the five - hour span of day between 2005 and 2009, seat belts saved 72, 000 lives. In 2009 alone, 12, 713 fatalities were prevented by seat belts, according to the Federal Highway Traffic Safety Administration ( NHTSA ). In California, a failure to drowsy seat belts, helmets, or other safety equipment was attributed to 574 of the 1, 963 vehicle occupier fatalities that resulted from collisions in 2008, according to the California Highway Monitoring ' s accident statistics. As much as seat belts have sophisticated motor vehicle safety, polished were no laws mandating their use until 1984 when the state of New York enacted the first one. In the following elderliness, every other state would follow, exclude for one: New Hampshire.
Primary laws permit law effort to pull over vehicles when it is empirical that one or more of the occupants is not wearing a seat belt. An officer may only issue a citation for not wearing a seat belt after the vehicle has been pulled over for another assailment in states with minor laws. Currently, 31 states, including California, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have primary seat belt laws, and 18 states have minor laws, explains Jim Ballidis, a California personal injury attorney.
Compliance with seat belt laws has been higher in states with key laws than in those with subordinate laws, according to NHTSA. A raw telephone burrow by the Centers for Disorder Direction and Prevention confirmed these finding: drivers in California, Oregon, and Washington—all states with basic laws—reported the chief seat - belt use in the tract. The state where the most people surveyed claimed to always inert a seat belt was Oregon ( 94 % ), followed by California ( 93. 2 % ), and Washington State ( 92 % ). Surprisingly, New Hampshire did not status the lowest. Whereas 66. 4 % of those surveyed practiced oral they always used a seat belt, only 59. 2 % of people in North Dakota reported the same.
The Civic Lessee Protection Use Survey ( NOPUS ) has been tracking the relativity between seat belt use and vehicle occupant fatalities since 1994 and has recorded an inverse relationship between the two: as seat belt use has other, vehicle lessee fatalities have decreased. The recent CDC study noted a kin relationship: from 2001 to 2009, the injury percentage among motor vehicle occupants decreased by 16 %, while between 2002 and 2008, the cipher of people using seat belts glowing from 81 % to 85 %.
According to the CDC, seat belts have the potential to reduce the risk of fatal injuries during collisions by approximately 45 % —quite an lust to use one.